🛸'Cause I Got High Because I Got High🚁
The intersection of blockchain technology and social welfare presents intriguing possibilities that deserve serious consideration. I've been developing two complementary concepts that could fundamentally transform how Americans interact with taxation and receive baseline economic support—both powered by advertising revenue rather than traditional government spending.
The Tax Offset Network
The first proposal establishes a blockchain-based system where citizens receive NGO-issued tablets that function as network nodes. These devices would display targeted advertising focused on financial services, tax preparation software, legal resources, and civic information—content that's actually relevant when people are thinking about their tax obligations.
The blockchain would track each citizen's tax liability through smart contracts while simultaneously allocating advertising revenue directly toward reducing those obligations. Instead of writing checks to the IRS, Americans would engage with educational content and sponsored materials throughout the year. The distributed ledger ensures transparency, showing exactly how ad revenue flows toward tax reduction. Over time, as advertiser participation grows and the network reaches scale, individual tax burdens could decrease substantially or potentially be eliminated for many citizens.
The Universal Income Protocol
The second concept operates independently: a dedicated blockchain network where citizens receive smaller smartphone devices that serve as mining nodes. Marketing professionals and brands would sponsor this network, paying for placement and engagement in the native token. This digital currency would have real-world redemption value, functioning as the distribution mechanism for Universal Basic Income.
Citizens earn tokens simply by maintaining their devices online and occasionally interacting with sponsored content. The blockchain's consensus mechanism rewards participation while ensuring equitable distribution. Marketing firms gain access to engaged audiences, citizens receive guaranteed income, and the decentralized structure prevents manipulation or unfair allocation.
Implementation Costs and Revenue Potential
Distributing devices to approximately 260 million American adults would require significant upfront investment. Budget tablets can be manufactured at scale for roughly $50-75 per unit, while basic smartphones cost $30-50. Assuming dual-device distribution, we're looking at $21-32 billion in hardware costs—substantial but manageable when compared to annual federal spending.
The advertising market tells an encouraging story. Digital advertising in the United States exceeds $300 billion annually. Capturing even a fraction of this market through mandatory engagement and guaranteed impressions could generate tremendous revenue. A network with 260 million daily active participants would be unmatched in reach and verification.
Both systems would likely generate surplus revenue beyond their stated goals of tax elimination and UBI provision. These funds could finance infrastructure improvements, education initiatives, or other public goods—decided transparently through on-chain governance.
The key advantage of these blockchain-based approaches is their verifiability and resistance to traditional bureaucratic inefficiencies. Every transaction, every ad impression, and every token distribution would exist on an immutable public ledger. Critics may question the feasibility of such sweeping changes, but the underlying technology is proven, and the advertising revenue clearly exists. What's required is political will and careful implementation.
These aren't utopian fantasies—they're engineering problems with viable solutions
